Both Celina and Chris made good points regarding both questions but you have to look both them differently as well.
The first question has to deal with the recent Tuscon shootings. I believe that this could have all been some what avoided if the state of Arizona would have had a much stronger security system set up for those U.S. Representatives when out and about. Instead an individual that was supposively "unstable" had a gun and just went on a shooting spree for no apparent reason and due to the fact people were severely injured and killed. All inocent lives when the state could have avoided it. Now that it has all happened and the state has found the man who did it they are trying to say that he is menatlly unstable and thats the reason he did what he did. But you know what if you know to take a gun load it and shoot people with it you are capable of doing the crime abd should be punished just the same as any other criminal that has done a severe crime.
The next question was the remarks that our current govenor had made to the NAACP. Yes the comment that he had made wasn't the right way to answer the group. I do believe he could have gone another direction with the answer but the day of the NAACP's annual meeting that they were having govenor Lepage already had planned on attending a state troopers funeral in Vasselboro and he had told the NAACP repeatedly that he wasn't gonna be able to make it to there meeting and dinner in Portland. The group continued to ask him about going and attending and after telling them over and over again that he couldn't attend he had said some words that probably shouldn't have been said but the NAACP wouldn't listen to him the first time he answered them so Lepage hit a breaking point. Obviously his answer was alittle harsh and could have been handled better. Now that Lepage didn't attend the meeting they are applying that hes a racists when he is clearly not cause he had a previous commitment before that event.
No comments:
Post a Comment